|
High-profile cases of sexual assault,
especially those that happen in our state, make us pause
and return to the big questions in our work to end sexual
violence. The horrifying gang rape that occurred at
Dunbar Village this past summer is such a case.
According to the Palm Beach Post, on June
18, 2007, up to ten armed youths between the ages of
14 and 18 forced themselves into a woman's apartment
where they repeatedly raped her, smashed a plate over
her son's head and poured household chemicals into his
eyes and over her body. The details of the crime, many
of which are not included here, have horrified even
veteran investigators.
The depth of violation, violence and devastation
in this type of case takes a toll on advocates and highlights
the need to address compassion fatigue on an ongoing
basis in our work.
The case also demands that we look again
at the intersections of racism, classism and sexual
violence and struggle with the complexities of how to
effectively advocate for victims and communities facing
multiple oppressions. The answers aren’t simple
and aren’t easily packaged into the job descriptions
of advocates already overworked tending to those survivors
who make it to the front door or directors struggling
to keep programs afloat. But at the start of
a new year, we owe it to ourselves, the survivors we
serve and our world to take a few minutes and imagine
how we can begin to change things for those harshest
hit by injustice.
Dunbar Village, built in 1940 with 245
apartments, is a public housing complex run by the West
Palm Beach Housing Authority. According to the Palm
Beach Post, during the year leading up to the attack
on the mother and her 12-year-old, police responded
to Dunbar Village 717 times, an average of about two
times a day. Residents have been quick to point out,
however, that this crime could have happened anywhere,
and that the majority of offenders, including the perpetrators
of the gang rape, do not live in Dunbar.
This month, The Reverend Al Sharpton visited
the complex, and was quoted in the Palm Beach Post saying,
“We must look beyond the surface of the savage
attack to see what is the environment it is made in."
While some residents are quick to defend their community,
many want desperately to move but don’t have the
resources to do so. Poverty pins residents of public
housing complexes such as Dunbar against a wall and
doesn’t leave much room to move.
Poverty
and Sexual Violence
The Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape (PCAR) is engaged
in groundbreaking work looking at the links between
poverty and sexual violence and asking advocates to
make economic advocacy a cornerstone of anti-rape work.
In their wonderful manual,
Poverty
and Sexual Violence: Building Prevention and Intervention
Responses, they point out that perpetrators of sexual
violence often target individuals who lack power in
the larger society and who will be less likely to report
or when they do tell someone, less likely to be believed
or deemed credible. People living in poverty are often
either ignored or penalized by the larger society. Therefore,
poverty often serves to silence and discredit survivors,
especially when it is compounded by other forms of oppression
and isolation.
According to the PCAR’s
manual:
Research shows an undeniable, complex, and often
cyclical connection between poverty and sexual violence.
People living in poverty and lacking economic power
and resources are at greater risk for sexual violence.
Persons with a household income under $7,500 are twice
as likely as the general population to be sexual assault
victims (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1996).
For thousands of women, a lack of
economic resources has devastating consequences on their
abilities to alter their environments or to live in
safety, particularly if they have dependent children.
People living in poverty experience daily stressors
in meeting the basic needs some of us take for granted,
such as obtaining food, shelter, transportation or clothing
and keeping themselves and their families safe.
Poverty can make the daily lives of
women and children more dangerous and make them more
dependent on others for survival and, therefore, less
able to control their own sexuality, to consent to sex,
to recognize their own victimization or to seek help
when victimized; poverty can necessitate high-risk survival
activities (CDC, 2007). For instance, according to the
World Health Organization’s World Report on Violence
and Health (2002), poverty increases one’s vulnerabilities
to sexual exploitation in the workplace, schools, and
in prostitution, sex trafficking, and the drug trade
(Krug, et al., 2002). Individuals who lack sufficient
economic resources to meet their basic needs, specifically
women, may have to resort to bartering for essential
goods with sex (Jewkes, Sen, & Garcia-Moreno, 2002).
Advocacy
with Public Housing Agencies
The Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence (FCADV),
under the leadership of consultant Lynn Rosenthal, has
created materials and trainings designed to help advocates
build relationships with public housing authorities
to improve the response of public housing to victims
of domestic violence and look at ways to make public
housing safer. Ms. Rosenthal points out that advocates
know well how to do systems change work—advocates
have been focusing on making criminal justice systems
more responsive to victims for years. The reality, however,
especially for victims of sexual violence, is that only
a small minority of victims interface with the criminal
justice system. It is just as, if not more, important
to engage systems such as public housing to reach many
historically underserved survivors and their communities.
Advocates can transfer skills they’ve learned
advocating for victims in the criminal justice system.
FCADV’s excellent manual, Protecting
Access to Public and Voucher Housing: An Advocacy Manual
for Domestic Violence Centers, provides some concrete
strategies for beginning advocacy with public housing
authorities that are easily extrapolated to advocates
in rape crisis centers. Here are a few ideas for how
to begin the work of reaching out to public housing
communities and the victims living there:
1. Learn more about public housing
including your local public housing agencies.
FCADV’s manual provides an introduction
to understanding public housing:
Public housing is intended to provide decent and
safe rental housing for eligible low-income families,
the elderly, and persons with disabilities. Public housing
comes in all sizes and types, from scattered single-family
houses to high-rise apartments and is commonly referred
to as “housing projects.” These units are
owned and operated by public housing agencies. While
the focus for many years was the creation of public
housing units, in the mid 1970s public housing assistance
shifted to subsidizing housing on the private market
through vouchers. Today, voucher programs are the greatest
source of subsidized housing for low income families
and individuals. Originally called Section 8 and now
referred to as the Housing Choice Voucher Program, the
purpose of vouchers is to keep tenants from having to
pay more than 30% of their income on rent. Tenants find
a house or apartment to rent from a landlord willing
to take the voucher, and the voucher makes up the difference
between 30% of the tenant’s household income and
the payment standard for rent in that area. The funding
for both public housing and voucher housing is appropriated
by Congress and administered by the Department of Housing
and Urban Affairs (HUD). On the local level, HUD provides
these funds to public housing agencies, who in turn
administer one or both of these programs at the local
level.
A Public Housing Agency (PHA) is a
state, county, municipality or other governmental entity
or public body authorized to engage in or assist in
the development or operation of low-income housing.
There are 117 public housing agencies in Florida. These
agencies are governed locally by appointed or elected
Boards of Commissioners and an Executive Director. There
is no state agency that acts as a PHA in Florida.
A good place to begin advocacy
is to determine the PHAs in your area by visiting HUD’s
website: http://www.hud.gov/local/fl/renting/hawebsites.cfm.
It then makes sense to figure out what
type of public housing each of the agencies provides
and who are the best staff people with whom to work.
2. Engage PHAs in planning around the needs
of victims of sexual violence.
The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA)
as reauthorized in 2005 amends the federal housing planning
process so that public housing agencies must address
domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and
stalking in their five-year and annual plans. VAWA 2005
requires that the five-year plan include a statement
of the “goals, objectives, policies, or programs
that will enable the housing authority to serve the
needs of child and adult victims of domestic violence,
dating violence, sexual assault and stalking.”
In addition, PHAs must report in their annual plans
on activities, services or programs they have provided
or partnered with other service providers to offer these
victims, including services to maintain housing, prevent
the violence or enhance victim safety.
Take some time to think about prevention,
intervention and outreach strategies that might enhance
safety and services for those in public housing in your
area. Use the skills you’ve developed as an advocate
in other systems to develop working relationships with
PHA administrators. Often, as we’ve learned from
work developing Sexual Assault Interagency Councils
(SAICs), the relationship has to begin director to director.
3. Ask PHAs to use their discretion
in favor of victims of sexual violence.
Federal law provides PHAs with a great
deal of discretion for developing local policies governing
housing programs, and these policies can have a dramatic
effect on the lives of victims of sexual violence. PHAs
can give preferences for admission to victims of sexual
violence and are more likely to do so if they have a
strong working relationship with the local rape crisis
center.
4. Partner with domestic violence
programs.
Many domestic violence programs have already
received training in how best to reach out to public
housing authorities on issues of violence against women.
Rape crisis programs that are not dual service agencies
should reach out to the local domestic violence program
and team-up. The work will be easier together. For dual
programs, make sure you are addressing issues of sexual
violence as well as domestic violence in your work with
public housing.
While only those closest to the
crime can truly understand its impact, we can all bear
witness to the suffering of this particular Dunbar Village
family by taking a few minutes in our work week to do
one thing to extend our services and our skills to communities
in dire need of support.
|
|
This project
was supported by Grant Number 2005-WF-AX-0055 awarded
by the Violence Against Women Grants Office, Office
of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points
of view in this document are those of the author and
do not necessarily represent the official position or
policies of the U.S. Department of Justice or the Florida
Department of Children and Families.
Federal Appropriations
Update:
On December
26, 2007, the President signed a $555 billion
omnibus funding package for fiscal year 2008.
This bill combined all of the unfinished appropriations
for FY 2008, including the Labor, Health and Human
Services and Education (LHHS) and Commerce, Justice,
Science (CJS) appropriations bills. This means
that funding for VAWA and VOCA programs (e.g.,
Rural Grants Program, RPE, SASP, STOP, etc.) and
many other programs on which survivors and their
children rely including, Head Start, child care,
housing assistance, and home energy aid, will
be funded through one omnibus spending measure.
Good News:
• For the first time, the Sexual
Assault Services Program will be funded and
federal resources for sexual assault victim services
will be made available. The first time funding
level for SASP is $9.4 million.
• Overall, VAWA programs administered
by the Department of Justice have seen a $17.3
million increase.
In addition
to SASP being funded for the first time, other
VAWA programs receiving first time funding
include:
• Engaging Men and Youth in Prevention:
$2.8 million
• Services for Youth Victims: $2.8 million
• Services for Teens: $2.8 million
• Services for Children Exposed to Domestic
Violence: $2.8 million
Programs
receiving increases include:
• STOP grants: $8.8 million increase
• Transitional Housing: $2.7 million increase
• Services for Rural Victims: $1.6 million
increase
Bad News:
Many programs in the omnibus package received
cuts including the Victim of Crime Act Fund (VOCA),
which has been cut by $35 million. Though many
members of Congress supported increases to the
VOCA cap, the pressure from the President to cut
funding was just too strong.
Programs within
the Labor Health and Human Services budget like
the Rape Prevention and Education program and
the Family Violence Prevention Services Act (FVPSA)
received no funding increases or cuts, leaving
them at the same funding level as last year. Each
year, however, all programs have a small percent
taken off their overall budget, called a rescission.
This year the rescission for programs in the LHHS
portion of the bill was a 1.747% across-the-board
cut, which essentially cuts funding to these programs.
VAWA
programs receiving cuts include:
• Legal Assistance to Victims: $2.1 million
cut
• Center for Sex Offender Management: $1.6
million cut
• Grants to Encourage Arrest: $3.2 million
cut
Take
Action Against VOCA Cuts:
Several groups including the National Alliance
to End Sexual Violence (NAESV) and the National
Center for Victims of Crime (NCVC) have been working
in coalition on the national level to advocate
for increased VOCA spending (which was cut in
FY08 to $590 million or $35 million less than
prior year funding) and to guard against any further
cuts in VOCA assistance grants to the states.
NCVC put together a survey to gather information
to share with policymakers about the real-world
effect and impact of this year's drastic cut.
Please help us by taking a
few minutes today to complete a national
survey coordinated by NCVC. While we request
that each agency or organization only complete
the survey one time, additional comments by
other staff can be sent to tpoore@fcasv.org
and will be forwarded to national advocates.
|
|